I have analyzed the vulnerability description for CVE-2025-53669 in the Jenkins VAddy Plugin. The core of the vulnerability lies in the fact that the Vaddy API Authentication Key is displayed in plaintext on the job configuration page, making it susceptible to being captured by an attacker with sufficient permissions.
The security advisory states that version 1.2.8 and earlier are affected and that no patch was available at the time of publication. This indicates the vulnerability exists in the latest released version of the code.
My analysis of the plugin's source code, specifically the UI definition files, has pinpointed the exact location of the vulnerability. The file src/main/resources/com/vaddy/jenkins/VaddyScan/config.jelly is responsible for rendering the configuration form for the Vaddy Scan build step.
Within this file, the following line of code creates a standard text field for the authToken parameter:
<f:entry title="${%VADDY_AUTH_TOKEN}" field="authToken">
<f:textbox />
</f:entry>
The <f:textbox /> tag generates a simple text input field, which does not mask the input. The proper, secure way to handle secrets in Jenkins configuration forms is to use the <f:password /> tag, which would render a password field that masks the entered value.
Because the form field is a standard textbox, any previously saved authToken will be rendered in plaintext in the HTML of the configuration page, visible to anyone who can view the job configuration.
The VaddyScan.java file contains the DescriptorImpl class which acts as the controller for this configuration. The authToken field in this class is where the value from the form is stored. While the storage of the key in config.xml is also a vulnerability (CVE-2025-53668), the unmasked presentation in the UI is the specific subject of CVE-2025-53669. The doCheckAuthToken method in DescriptorImpl is responsible for validating the token, but it does not play a role in how the token is displayed.
Therefore, the vulnerable "function" in a broader sense is the rendering of the configuration UI, directly caused by the use of <f:textbox /> in config.gsp. While not a traditional function call in a stack trace, this is the code that directly leads to the exposure of the secret in the user interface.